- Guidelines for Ph.D. Candidates
- Guidelines for Ph.D. Research Proposal and Comprehensive Exam
- Guidelines for M.A.Sc. and M.Sc. Candidates
- Transfer of Graduate Students from an M.A.Sc. and M.Sc. program to Ph.D. program
- M.A.Sc. Exams Evaluation Protocol
Guidelines for Ph.D. Candidates
Revised September 2019
- Each Ph.D. candidate will have a Supervisory Committee consisting of the Research Supervisor(s) and at least two other members. One of the Supervisory Committee members may be from outside the Department. Non-UBC scholars or prominent representatives of industry may join the Supervising Committee after approval by the Dean of the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies
- There are no calendar course requirements for a Ph.D. program. A Ph.D. candidate may be required by his/her Research Supervisor and/or Supervisory Committee to take certain academic courses for credit, depending on the candidate’s background in relation to the field of study. The candidate may choose to audit other courses.
- All candidates must register in MTRL 598 and present at least one research seminar during their Ph.D. program. The seminar is given no later than the third year of study.
Registration for MTRL 598 should be made in the year that the presentation is given.
Students who have either
i) completed a seminar in MTRL 598 as part of a previous M.A.Sc. program or
ii) completed a seminar in MTRL 598 prior to transferring to the Ph.D. program
are required to complete a seminar as a Ph.D. candidate. The graduate assistant should be advised in this situation.
- Within 12 months of admission to the Ph.D. program each candidate must pass an oral comprehensive examination. Within 24 months each candidate must submit a Research Proposal and defend it in front of the Supervisory Committee. Rules for the Research Proposal/Comprehensive Examination are listed in the Appendix and further detailed here.
- The Supervisory Committee will meet at least once a year with the student to review his/her progress. The student is expected to provide a written summary of his/her progress to the committee.
- Candidates for the Ph.D. program are normally expected to complete their thesis within four years of admission. Therefore, Ph.D. candidates will be provided a Research Assistantship for a four year period subject to satisfactory progress. An extension of funding may be granted following a review of the student’s progress by his/her supervisory committee. A student who has been in the Ph.D. program for more than three years is not eligible for a Teaching Assistantship.
- Before preparing a thesis, candidates should read the Dissertation & Thesis Preparation guidelines on the Graduate Studies website
- The candidate will review a draft of the thesis with his/her Supervisory Committee, and make necessary modifications. Copies of the final version of the thesis will be delivered to all interested members of faculty.
- Not less than 10 days after the thesis are delivered to faculty; the candidate will present and defend the thesis in a Departmental Oral Examination which is convened by the Department Head. The Examining Committee shall consist of at least four faculty members (chair, supervisor(s), and 2 examiners at least one of which must be at the rank of Associate or Full Professor level), a majority of whom will be from the Materials Engineering Department. Other considerations include ensuring the examiners have sufficient independence from the research project. Other students are welcome to attend the examination and to participate in questioning.
- After the thesis has been approved by the Examining Committee, and any changes required have been made, two copies of the thesis are to be delivered to the Dean of Graduate Studies with a request to set up the final oral examination. One of these copies is to be transmitted to an External Examiner, who has previously been commissioned. The final exam will be convened not less than six weeks after the thesis has been sent to the External Examiner.
- The final Oral Examining Committee consists of the Dean of Graduate Studies or his appointee as Chair, members of the candidate’s supervisory committee, one other faculty member from the Department of Materials Engineering, one faculty member from another Department, and the External Examiner (usually unable to be present, and his/her report is presented by the Research Supervisor).
- Upon satisfactory completion of the oral examination, the candidate will be required to complete revisions specified by the examining committee. Following approval of the Corrections by the research supervisor, requisite copies of the thesis should be submitted to Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies Office
- Prior to leaving the department, the student is expected to meet with his/her research supervisor to determine whether equipment utilized by the student is to be stored or retained in the laboratory for an incoming or current graduate student. It is the responsibility of the student to compile all research results and samples, including software developed during the Ph.D. program, and hand it over to the research supervisor with proper documentation. The student’s desk and surrounding workspace should also be cleared of all research material.
Guidelines for Ph.D. Comprehensive Examination and Research Proposal Examination
- Six to eight topics will be selected for the exam by the supervisor from the general list of exam topics defined for MTRL. Two weeks prior to the exam, the candidate will be delivering a one-page brief description of his/her project together with the exam topics for review by all examination committee members. The exam is chaired by MTRL Head (or designate); the examining committee (Supervisor + 2 more MTRL faculty at least one of which must be at the rank of Associate or Full Professor) typically becomes the supervising committee after the exam. In a number of cases, it may beneficial to have a supervisory committee that includes one faculty member from outside the MTRL Department who would then replace one of the examining committee members. Interested students may attend the examination as observers.
- Based on the performance of the candidate at the oral examination, the Examining Committee may:
(a) pass the candidate
(b) require the candidate to repeat the examination within 4-6 weeks
(c) advise the candidate to withdraw
Having passed the comprehensive examination is a requirement to proceed to the stage of the research proposal defense.
Research Proposal Defense
- Each candidate for the Ph.D. degree is required to prepare a written research proposal, not to exceed 24 double-spaced typewritten pages in total length plus 2 pages of references. It is expected that candidates will spend not more than 4 months preparing this proposal.
- The research proposal will normally include a thorough literature survey in the field selected for study, and will also include a critical evaluation of previous work, a clear delineation between what is known and unknown, and the selection of a well defined problem area for investigation. It should also include the methods to be used in solving the problem, as well as a justification of the research as a potentially significant contribution to knowledge. The editing and literary style of the proposal is the candidate’s responsibility.
- The written proposal, if acceptable to the candidate’s Research Supervisor(s), will be made available by the candidate to all interested members of faculty. As soon as convenient thereafter, the candidate’s Research Supervisor will convene an oral examination of the candidate.
- The proposal defense will include a 20-25 minute oral presentation of the research proposal followed by two rounds of questioning. Questions will focus on assessing the candidate’s knowledge specifically related to the research proposal. The overall objective of the examination is to demonstrate to the Committee that the candidate has the ability and background necessary to pursue the proposed research.
- The Examining Committee will normally consist of the Candidate’s Research Supervisor(s), and two examiners at least one of which must be at the rank of Associate Professor. The Research Supervisor acts as the chair of the Proposal exam. Interested students may attend the examination as observers.
- Based on the written proposal and on the performance of the candidate at the oral examination, the Examining Committee may:
(a) accept the proposal
(b) suggest changes to the research plan
(c) require the candidate to repeat the proposal defense
(d) advise the candidate to withdraw.
The repeat of the proposal defense will normally occur 6-8 weeks after the initial examination.
Guidelines for M.A.Sc. and M.Sc. Candidates
September 1, 2016
- Each M.A.Sc. and M.Sc. candidate will have a standing Supervisory Committee of faculty, consisting of the Research Supervisor(s).
- The candidate and the Supervisory Committee are expected to meet at an early stage in the program to plan the candidate’s research program.
- The academic courses which must be taken for credit by each candidate will be determined in consultation with his/her Research Supervisor, and with the approval of the Department Head. At least 18 credits of course work are required of which at least 12 credits must be graduate courses and the remaining 6 credits either third or fourth year courses.
- All candidates must register in MTRL 598 and must present a research seminar to satisfy the requirements of the course. Seminars are normally given in the second year of study.Students should register for MTRL 598 in the year that they plan to give their seminar.
- A maximum of 3 credits may be taken in directed studies (MTRL 593 courses).
- Upon admission, M.A.Sc. and M.Sc. candidates will be offered Research Assistantship appointments for a maximum of 2 years, subject to satisfactory progress by the student. In the unusual case of a student requiring funding beyond the 2 year period, the student must make formal application to the Supervisory Committee for an extension of the funding. It is expected that the M.A.Sc. and M.Sc. program will normally be completed within 18 months of admission.
- In certain cases a transfer to the Ph.D. program can be made without completion of the M.A.Sc. or M.Sc. degree. After one year residency at UBC and 9 credits of course work with an overall 85% average and clear evidence of research ability, well qualified M.A.Sc.and M.Sc. candidates may apply for transfer to a Ph.D. program. A committee of the Department Head, the Department Graduate Advisor, and the candidates Research Supervisor will consider the application. (Refer to Appendix A for details on the transfer to the PhD program).
Transfer of Graduate Students to a Ph.D. Program Before Completion of the M.A.Sc. or M.Sc. Program.
- The normal procedure will be that an M.A.Sc. or M.Sc. candidate will complete his/her program before becoming a Ph.D. candidate.
- A student with bachelor degree with one year of study in a master’s program with 9 credits of first class average (6 credits must be at the 500-level or above), with overall 85% average and demonstrated evidence of research ability or potential, may be considered for transfer to a Ph.D. program. The research performance must be identifiable and evaluated. In the case of an international student already holding an M.A.Sc. or M.Sc. degree, normally a minimum of 9 credits of course work (of which 6 credits must be at the 500-level or above) will be completed before consideration for transfer to a Ph.D. program. In order to maintain registration in the doctoral program:
- students must complete 12 credits with a first-class average
- at least 9 of the 12 credits must be at the 500-level or above
- at least 9 of the 12 credits must be of first class standing
- An Ad Hoc Committee consisting of the Department Head, the faculty member dealing with graduate student admittance and the research supervisor of the graduate student will consider the transfer and decide whether the transfer will be approved by the Department.The research performance of the candidate must be identifiable and evaluated by the Committee.
- Transfer into a doctoral program is normally accomplished after the first year of study at the master’s level and will not be permitted after completion of the second year.
- In exceptional cases, applicants who hold an honours bachelor’s degree with an overall average in the ‘A’ grade range and who demonstrate advanced research ability may be granted direct admission to a doctoral degree program on recommendation of the admitting Graduate Program and approval of the Dean of the Faculty of Graduate Studies. Students entering directly from a bachelor’s degree must, during the first year of study, complete 12 credits with a first class average of which at least 9 credits must be at the 500-level or above and at least 9 credits must be of first class standing, to maintain registration as a doctoral student.
- If a graduate student is transferred to a Ph.D. program, he/she should present his/her research proposal comprehensive approximately three months after the transfer.
- Requests for transfer should be submitted to the Department Head by the research supervisor of the graduate student.
MTRL M.A.Sc. EXAM EVALUATION
October 12, 2011
The examination committee is to evaluate two components:
- The quality, level and nature of revision required to the thesis
- The candidate’s performance during the oral exam
Considering the overall quality of the thesis, the examination committee should decide on the level and nature of revision required to the thesis.
- Thesis is outstanding. No, or only minor corrections required. (Supervisor approves corrections.)
- Thesis is satisfactory. Minor revisions required. (Supervisor approves revisions.)
- Thesis is satisfactory subject to substantive revision affecting content. (Supervisor and examination committee approve revision.)
- Thesis is unsatisfactory in current form. Major rewriting and rethinking required. (Thesis re-submitted and re-evaluated by examination committee.)
The examination committee should decide on the candidate’s performance while presenting the work (20-25 min presentation), responding to questions, and defending the work.
- Outstanding performance. No weakness displayed in presentation, response to questions, and defense of the work. Clear and complete understanding of work performed and related engineering principles.
- Satisfactory performance. No substantive weakness displayed in presentation, response to questions, and defense of the work. Satisfactory understanding of work performed and related engineering principles.
- Marginal performance. Weaknesses in presentation, response to questions, or defense of the work. Deficiencies in comprehension of work performed and related engineering principles.
- Unsatisfactory performance. Major weaknesses in presentation, response to questions, or defense of the work. Poor comprehension of work performed and related engineering principles.
The awarded mark is based on the oral exam and the thesis performance according to the table below.